COMMENT TO
THE EPA
One
third of our carbon pollution in the USA is coming from energy
production. Ameren Missouri is the largest corporate provider of
home, government and industry electrical power in Missouri,
especially in the two largest metro areas, St. Louis and Kansas City.
Our state is also largely rural, so there are many individual
electrical cooperatives in the countryside as well. Although I lived
more years of my life in St. Louis than any other place, I am now a
resident of Mexico, Missouri, and have also lived in four other small
Missouri towns at various times. Here we have both electrical power
and natural gas provided by Ameren Missouri, a company that is
probably one of the wealthiest corporations in the State. Over eighty
percent of Missouri's electrical power is produced from coal. Coal is
definitely a global warming producing fuel, and known to affect
children and adults with respiratory and heart disease.
Meanwhile,
we have Calloway County Nuclear Plant still working, and it has had
an occasional issue that required at least partial shutdowns. With
the risks of how to dispose of nuclear waste, as is also still in
existence in North St. Louis County, related to previous weapon
related waste, no one I have ever known personally is in favor of
nuclear power.
In
recent past years we had a ballot initiative passed that sought to
increase the amount of energy obtained from renewable resources such
as wind, solar, geothermal and water power. In fact, however, the
State Legislators have sought to override this kind of citizen driven
upgrade by adding in the already existing hydroelectric plants at the
Bagnell Dam, where construction was completed in 1931 by crews that
included my uncle Fred. So my personal perspective has been that our
officials are not as friendly to increasing renewable energy as the
citizenry is. We definitely need more solar, wind and geothermal
power here. The grid has been upgraded, I have heard, to allow for
shared overages from home solar. But we need to move away from fossil
fuels altogether. Home solar alone cannot accomplish that.
On
the other hand large installations of solar are plausible on large
box stores, on some rooftops of large industries and wind power in
North East Missouri is quite feasible and in use-- perhaps
expandable. More wind could readily be installed in our State or
imported from Kansas and points west. As a child I saw windmills of
the old metal sort all over the State when we traveled to visit
relatives in the countryside.
Ameren
may have a solar installation somewhere in St. Louis County too. But
we are still burning over eighty percent of energy from coal! It is
time for Missouri to move into new territory with decreasing the use
of any sort of fossil fuel. I am not in favor of substituting
so-called clean natural gas for coal.
As
a member of the Sierra Club and a citizen environmentalist I hope we
can move in a direction that will stall global warming trends for the
future of our next generations. I believe this is still possible. The
organization is seeking to upgrade or shut down coal plants across
the USA; and in this State we need to focus first on the oldest
plant, the Meramec Plant, and then on the Labadie Plant.
One
of the oldest operating plants is the Meramec Plant, and it can
barely be upgraded, so it is perhaps needing to be scrapped. Then we
can work to upgrade or change the Labadie Plant, which affects more
people with air pollution-- that causes human illness, by impairments
and early death-- than any other plant in the State. The Ameren
solutions offered, such as lower energy use light bulbs, are well and
good. But I hope that the Environmental Protection Agency, working
with Missourians, can establish regulations to change the quantity of
global warming emissions that we produce in our State.
Thank
you so much for considering my comments and meeting with Missourians.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated so may take a little while to appear. Thanks for letting me know your thoughts.